Global Legal Post publishes its 2026 Corporate Tax and Tax Controversy Law Guide covering 37 jurisdictions, including Nigeria
The Global Legal Post published its 2026 edition of the Corporate Tax and Tax Controversy Law Guide on 22 September 2026, a comparative reference covering 37 jurisdictions across multiple regions including Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, Germany, Ghana, and Nigeria, among others. The guide covers both corporate tax frameworks and tax controversy practice, meaning the procedures and strategies available when tax assessments are disputed by companies before domestic tribunals, courts, or through international mechanisms. The Nigeria chapter is among those published, reflecting the continued commercial importance of that jurisdiction for international investors and for firms active in sub-Saharan African markets. Comparative guides of this kind serve a practical function for cross-border practitioners: they provide a structured, jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction analysis of the legal framework, key rules, and dispute resolution landscape in markets where clients have operations or investment exposure. The 2026 edition reflects updated content across 37 chapters, giving in-house counsel and external advisers a current reference point for multi-jurisdictional tax planning and controversy management.
Why this matters
Cross-border corporate tax has become one of the most active areas of international legal practice, driven by the OECD global minimum tax framework, increased exchange of information between tax authorities, and rising audit activity in major economies. A guide spanning 37 jurisdictions gives practitioners a baseline for navigating the divergent national implementations of international standards. The inclusion of African jurisdictions such as Nigeria and Ghana reflects the growth of tax advisory work in emerging markets as foreign direct investment into those economies increases.
On the Ground
International tax and tax controversy practices are the primary beneficiaries of this kind of comparative resource. For firms advising multinationals on group structures, transfer pricing, or disputes with revenue authorities across multiple jurisdictions, comparative guides are working tools for scoping advice and coordinating local counsel instructions. A trainee on an international tax matter would use resources of this kind to prepare choice-of-law summaries, draft local counsel instruction letters setting out the questions to be addressed in each jurisdiction, and coordinate the collection and verification of jurisdiction-specific responses for incorporation into a multi-jurisdictional advice memo.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“How would you approach advising a multinational client that is facing tax authority audits in three different jurisdictions simultaneously, and what role does comparative legal analysis play in that process?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeSources
My notes
saved