Law firms that won the most cases at the US Supreme Court this term are identified, with one boutique dominating the pack
A review of the concluded US Supreme Court term found that very few law firms took on three or more cases, with one boutique firm dominating the field of repeat Supreme Court advocates. The analysis, which assessed firms by case count at the highest federal court, reflects a structural shift in appellate practice: specialist Supreme Court boutiques, rather than large full-service firms, are increasingly the dominant force in high-stakes federal litigation. Unlike recent terms, where multiple large firms maintained significant Supreme Court dockets, this term saw a concentration of multiple-case representation in a small number of specialist practices. The Court's docket included significant decisions on presidential removal power over independent agencies, labour law, and other constitutional questions. For UK-trained lawyers, the story is primarily of structural interest: it illustrates how a specialist appellate bar, operating at arm's length from large transactional firms, handles the most consequential US litigation. The UK Supreme Court and Court of Appeal operate on a similar principle, with specialist barristers' chambers rather than solicitor firms typically leading oral argument.
Why this matters
The corpus for this topic does not support a substantive UK or EU disputes story today. This story is included on the basis of the closest available source material, which covers US Supreme Court firm performance. The commercial implication for UK students is limited but real: the trend toward specialist appellate boutiques in the US mirrors the structural separation between solicitors and barristers in English appellate practice, and Magic Circle firms routinely instruct specialist barristers' chambers for Supreme Court and Court of Appeal appearances rather than conducting advocacy in-house.
On the Ground
A trainee supporting a disputes team on appellate work would assist with skeleton argument research, preparing chronologies of procedural history, and organising witness statement bundles and trial bundle pagination for court filing and service deadlines.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“How does the structure of appellate advocacy in the UK differ from the US, and what does that mean for how a Magic Circle firm handles a Supreme Court case?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeMy notes
saved