Global Legal Post Launches Foreign Direct Investment Comparative Guide as FDI Screening Complexity Reaches Mainstream Legal Practice
The Global Legal Post launched a new Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Law Guide this week, edited by Cooley partner Caroline Hobson, examining the growing complexity of foreign investment screening regimes across multiple jurisdictions worldwide. FDI screening refers to the process by which governments review and potentially block or condition inbound foreign investments on national security or strategic grounds. The guide's publication coincides with a period of sustained expansion in FDI control regimes globally, with the UK's National Security and Investment Act and the EU's FDI Screening Regulation among the frameworks now routinely encountered in cross-border transactions. The guide includes jurisdiction-specific chapters covering market insights for Belgium and the European Union, among others. The editorial introduction, contributed by Hobson, frames the core message as: 'Understanding FDI controls is no longer a specialist concern,' signalling that FDI risk assessment has migrated from niche national security advisory work into mainstream corporate M&A and private equity practice. The guide's launch follows the Global Legal Post's recent publication of a Global Fraud and Asset Tracing Law Guide and a Global AI Law Guide, suggesting a broader effort to map the evolving international legal landscape in areas where regulatory fragmentation creates deal-by-deal complexity.
Why this matters
The mainstreaming of FDI controls is one of the most significant structural changes to cross-border M&A practice in the past decade. Deals that would previously have required only competition clearance now routinely trigger parallel national security reviews in multiple jurisdictions, each with different timelines, thresholds, and information requirements. The practical consequence is that FDI review has become a standard condition to closing in most cross-border transactions above a modest size threshold, adding cost, uncertainty, and regulatory risk to deal timelines. For London-based firms advising on inbound UK investment or European acquisitions by non-EU buyers, FDI risk analysis is now a day-one workstream rather than an afterthought.
On the Ground
FDI law work is generating sustained demand in public law, corporate, and regulatory practices at Magic Circle and US firms with strong London presences. Transactions involving non-UK acquirors of UK targets in sensitive sectors, including technology, energy, defence supply chains, and healthcare, now require dedicated FDI screening advice from the outset. Cooley is named as the editorial firm behind this guide through partner Caroline Hobson. A trainee on an FDI matter would assist with sanctions screening memos, cross-border legal opinion coordination, preparing local counsel instruction letters for each jurisdiction in which a filing is required, and drafting treaty analysis notes where bilateral investment treaties affect the screening obligation.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“How has the expansion of FDI screening regimes changed the way City lawyers structure and advise on cross-border M&A transactions?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeMy notes
saved