Judge Rules Palestine Action 'Barclays Five' Will Not Be Sentenced as Terrorists After Burnley Branch Vandalism
Five Palestine Action activists who vandalised a Barclays branch in Burnley will not be sentenced as terrorists, a judge has ruled. The group, dubbed the 'Barclays five' and including Brendon O'Hagan, 28, were found guilty in June of causing criminal damage exceeding £200,000. The ruling means the defendants will be sentenced under standard criminal damage provisions rather than under terrorism legislation, a distinction with significant consequences for sentencing tariffs and the activists' records.
Why this matters
The ruling draws a meaningful line between serious protest-related criminal damage and conduct that crosses the terrorism threshold, a distinction courts have navigated carefully since Palestine Action's campaign against defence and financial sector targets escalated. The decision not to apply a terrorism sentencing framework limits the maximum exposure for the five defendants and turned on a narrow statutory question, with Judge Robert Altham at Preston Crown Court holding that although the damage was significant he was not satisfied it amounted to "serious damage" within the meaning of the Terrorism Act 2000. For Barclays, the ruling closes one avenue of enhanced restitution claims tied to terrorist offence status. The case is being watched by protest groups, prosecutors, and civil liberties lawyers as a marker for how far the State will push terrorism framing in the current political climate.
On the Ground
Criminal defence practitioners will be tracking the eventual sentencing hearing for guidance on how courts calibrate culpability and harm in high-value protest damage cases. Counter-terrorism and public order practices face renewed client questions about the boundary between aggravated criminal damage and terrorism offences. A trainee would be tasked with pulling together the relevant sentencing guidelines on criminal damage, cross-referencing the terrorism sentencing schedule, and preparing a comparative note on how similar Palestine Action cases have been resolved.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“What does it legally take to move a protest-related criminal damage case into terrorism sentencing territory, and why didn't this case meet that bar?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeMy notes
saved