UK Intellectual Property Office warns of a 165% surge in fraudulent trade mark invoice scams targeting registered trade mark holders
The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has issued a public warning about a dramatic rise in fraudulent invoices targeting businesses and individuals who hold registered trade marks. The IPO reports a 165% increase in fraudulent trade mark invoices in 2026 compared to the prior year. The scam typically involves third parties sending invoices that mimic official IPO communications, applying pressure tactics and urgent payment demands to deceive recipients into paying fees that are not owed to any legitimate body. The IPO has issued guidance emphasising that genuine IPO communications will not apply pressure tactics or demand urgent payment, and that official fees are clearly listed on the government's own website. The IPO's public guidance includes three practical steps: learning to identify authentic IPO communications, verifying that any fee being charged matches the published official fee schedule on gov.uk, and being alert to pressure or urgency language as a red flag. This type of fraud exploits the fact that trade mark holders must pay renewal fees and renewal deadlines are a matter of public record, making the holder pool an identifiable and targetable group. The scam has implications for IP law practices and their clients: businesses relying on registered trade marks as core commercial assets face a reputational and financial risk if they inadvertently pay fraudulent invoices or, worse, miss genuine renewal obligations while assuming communications are scams.
Why this matters
The 165% surge in fraudulent invoicing reported by the IPO is a regulatory enforcement and client-care issue for IP practices. Law firms holding trade mark portfolios on behalf of clients have a duty to ensure that renewal notices are properly managed and that fraudulent correspondence does not create confusion about genuine deadlines. For in-house legal teams, the risk is that junior staff process fake invoices or, conversely, that genuine renewal notices are dismissed as scams. The IPO's public guidance reflects a broader pattern of regulatory bodies stepping in to protect rights holders from fraud that exploits the public registration system. Firms with trade mark management mandates should review their client-facing communication protocols in light of this alert.
On the Ground
A trainee in an IP team would be updating the licence condition summaries and trade mark renewal tracking systems to flag the fraud risk, drafting client alerts advising on how to verify genuine IPO communications, and cross-checking the firm's own trade mark portfolio management records against the published official fee schedule on gov.uk.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“How should a law firm advise a corporate client that holds a significant trade mark portfolio in light of the IPO's warning about fraudulent invoicing, and what internal processes should be reviewed?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeMy notes
saved