The Crime and Policing Act 2026 extends corporate criminal liability for senior managers to all criminal offences, raising enforcement risk for regulated firms
The Crime and Policing Act 2026 has introduced a significant expansion of corporate criminal liability in England and Wales. Section 250 of the Act, which came into force on 29 June 2026, replaces sections 196 to 198 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA), which had previously extended corporate criminal liability to certain economic offences where a senior manager was involved. The new provision is broader in scope: under the 2026 Act, the senior manager attribution model, by which a company can be held criminally liable for an offence when it is committed by or consented to by a senior manager acting within the scope of their actual or apparent authority, now extends to all criminal offences, not merely economic crime. This is a material escalation of corporate liability exposure. Regulated firms are likely to be starting from a relatively advanced compliance base given existing FCA and PRA (Prudential Regulation Authority) requirements under the SMCR (Senior Managers and Certification Regime). Under SMCR, senior managers performing designated functions (SMFs) must be approved by the FCA or PRA, with responsibilities formally allocated. However, legal commentary notes that there is still work to be done to mitigate the risk of a criminal investigation under the new broader regime. Practitioners advising regulated firms have identified five key practical steps that firms should consider, including reviewing internal controls, updating senior manager responsibility maps, and assessing whether existing governance frameworks adequately capture the extended attribution risk.
Why this matters
The extension of the senior manager attribution model to all criminal offences, not merely economic crime, substantially widens the circumstances in which a corporation can face criminal prosecution in England and Wales. For regulated financial institutions, this arrives on top of an already demanding SMCR framework, but the new provision has implications well beyond FCA-regulated entities: any company whose senior manager commits any criminal offence within scope can now face corporate liability. The interaction with the pre-existing ECCTA 2023 provisions is important because section 250 replaces rather than supplements those sections, meaning firms must reassess their risk map rather than simply layering new obligations on top of old ones. This is a potential source of litigation risk wherever prosecutorial authorities decide to test the outer boundaries of the new attribution rule.
On the Ground
White-collar crime and regulatory practices will be the primary beneficiaries of advisory demand here, alongside employment lawyers advising on senior manager contracts and indemnity arrangements. Firms need to update their senior manager responsibility statements and governance frameworks to ensure that the expanded attribution risk is clearly allocated and monitored. Disputes teams may see increased instructions from corporates facing criminal investigations where the attribution question under section 250 is live. A trainee working on a regulatory compliance matter arising from this Act would be preparing compliance gap analysis memos comparing existing governance documents against the new statutory test, drafting regulatory notification memos for internal senior management, and updating remediation trackers that log which controls have been strengthened in response to the new exposure.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“How does the Crime and Policing Act 2026 change corporate criminal liability for regulated firms, and how does it interact with the existing Senior Managers and Certification Regime?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeMy notes
saved