FCA finds widespread product design failings in Consumer Duty review but points to measurable improvements where firms have engaged seriously
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published findings from a review of how financial firms are designing, monitoring, and distributing products and services under the Consumer Duty, the regulator's flagship conduct standard that requires firms to deliver good outcomes for retail customers. The review found genuine improvement in some areas: one firm reduced complaints about ATM withdrawals by 45% in three months after making its app information clearer and improving staff training. Many firms had strengthened product governance frameworks, improved their monitoring of customer outcomes, and taken greater responsibility for how products reach end consumers through distribution chains. However, the FCA identified three recurring areas of failure. First, some firms were defining their target markets too broadly, meaning products were being sold to consumers for whom they were unsuitable. Second, firms were slow to identify emerging risks from unsuitable products before those risks caused poor customer outcomes. Third, oversight of third parties, meaning the intermediaries and distributors that deliver products to customers on the firm's behalf, remained inconsistent. Charlotte Clark, Director of Cross-cutting policy at the FCA, stated that consumers should be able to trust that products are designed for their needs, monitored properly, and deliver expected outcomes. Rebecca Deegan, Director at Fair By Design, welcomed the report as a practical contribution to improving consumer outcomes, particularly highlighting the use of inclusive design principles. The findings signal that the FCA is moving from the implementation and guidance phase of Consumer Duty into a period of active scrutiny, with enforcement likely to follow for firms that continue to fall short.
Why this matters
The FCA's Consumer Duty review findings are significant because they mark the transition from 'implementation mode' to active regulatory scrutiny. Firms that have engaged seriously with the Duty are seeing measurable benefits, but those that have treated it as a box-ticking exercise now face escalating enforcement risk. The three failure areas identified, target market definition, emerging risk identification, and third-party oversight, are precisely the areas where financial services lawyers and compliance teams can add the most value through governance frameworks and contractual controls over distribution chains. For law students, this connects directly to the FCA's parallel enforcement posture: the regulator opened 11 Consumer Duty investigations in early July 2026, and the findings in this review provide the evidential baseline against which further enforcement action will be measured.
On the Ground
A trainee supporting a financial services client on Consumer Duty compliance would assist with drafting regulatory notification memos summarising the FCA's findings and their implications for the client's product suite. They would also prepare compliance gap analysis memos comparing the client's existing product governance framework against the good and poor practice examples identified in the FCA's review.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“How does the FCA's Consumer Duty product review change the risk profile for financial services firms, and what should their lawyers be doing now?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeSources
My notes
saved