Disputes
Linda Kitchen, 74, from Thornbury near Bristol, has begun proceedings in the High Court seeking damages from Singapore Airlines following a catastrophic turbulence incident in May 2024. Her husband Geoff Kitchen, 73, was fatally injured and died after the airline's flight from London Heathrow hit severe turbulence over Myanmar, dropping 178 feet in 4.6 seconds according to Singapore's Transport Safety Investigation Bureau, with the aircraft subsequently making an emergency landing in Bangkok. Linda suffered a broken back during the incident and spent ten days in hospital before being airlifted back to Bristol. Geoff is understood to have suffered a heart attack after the sudden altitude drop. Linda spent around two years seeking answers before issuing proceedings, with the claim now designed to help her access specialist support for her ongoing spinal injury and to secure a thorough investigation into what happened. Specialist aviation lawyer Anthe Korelidou is representing Linda Kitchen. Korelidou stated that the issuing of proceedings was "a major milestone" in providing the family with answers and ensuring the most thorough investigations were conducted. The case follows a wider wave of legal action arising from severe in-flight turbulence incidents, which have drawn heightened attention to airline safety standards, passenger duty of care, and the mechanisms by which carriers respond to weather-related emergencies at altitude.
Why this matters
Aviation personal injury claims of this nature typically engage the Montreal Convention, which governs international airline liability for passenger death or bodily injury and imposes strict liability on carriers for incidents occurring on board or during embarking and disembarking. The case is significant because it involves a fatality, a severe life-changing injury, and a surviving claimant seeking both financial damages and investigative accountability. It signals that UK claimants are increasingly willing to pursue carriers through English courts for in-flight incidents, even where the event occurred in foreign airspace. The two-year gap between the incident and proceedings reflects both the complexity of aviation claims and the personal toll of such litigation on surviving family members.
On the Ground
This matter activates aviation litigation and personal injury practice, with particular demand for expertise in international aviation conventions, cross-border procedural rules, and quantum (damages valuation) in fatal accident claims. Aviation insurance and liability teams at defendant-side firms will be engaged alongside claimant-side specialists. No law firms beyond the claimant's representative are named in the sources. A trainee on this type of matter would assist with disclosure review and document categorisation, preparing chronologies of the incident and medical history, researching the applicable international liability framework, and helping to paginate and index trial bundles.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“What legal framework governs a claim by a UK passenger against an international airline for a death caused by in-flight turbulence, and what would the claimant need to prove?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeMy notes
saved