LMA says sanctions clarity is needed before Hormuz trade resumes as the US ends its Iran blockade and maritime threat level is reduced
The London Market Association (LMA) — the representative body for Lloyd's of London underwriters and insurers — has said that clarity on the unwinding of Iran sanctions is required before normal trade through the Strait of Hormuz can resume, even as the US has formally ended its Iran blockade and the maritime threat level in the region has been reduced. The LMA's position is commercially significant for global shipping, insurance, and trade finance markets. War risk and trade disruption insurance for vessels transiting the Strait was priced at elevated levels during the conflict period. Reduced threat levels would normally trigger a repricing of those premiums, but the LMA's intervention signals that the legal architecture of sanctions — not just the military posture — must be clarified before insurers are willing to cover Iranian-origin or Iranian-destined cargo and vessels on normal terms. Sanctions on Iran span multiple jurisdictions: US primary sanctions (which apply to US persons and entities globally), US secondary sanctions (which can apply to non-US entities dealing with Iran), UK sanctions implemented through the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), and EU sanctions regimes. Each has its own licensing and General Licence framework, and inconsistencies between them create legal risk for shipowners, traders, and their financiers even where the underlying geopolitical conflict has been resolved. The unwinding of sanctions is a complex, multi-stage legal process that typically lags the diplomatic resolution by months or years, generating sustained demand for sanctions compliance counsel.
Why this matters
The LMA's call for sanctions clarity before Hormuz trade normalises is a direct signal that the peace deal has not yet created the legal certainty that insurers, shipowners, and trade finance banks need to re-engage with Iranian trade at scale. This is the 'legal lag' problem in sanctions unwinding: diplomatic agreements do not automatically lift statutory sanctions regimes, which require affirmative government action — licence updates, designation removals, or new General Licences — across multiple jurisdictions. For City firms with sanctions and trade finance practices, this creates a wave of advisory work: clients will need to understand precisely which activities remain prohibited, which are licensable, and on what timeline. Shipping finance lenders will need facility agreement covenant reviews to check whether Iran-related trading is permitted under existing loan documentation.
On the Ground
A trainee on a sanctions advisory matter would draft a sanctions screening memo, mapping the current status of UK (OFSI), US (OFAC), and EU sanctions on Iran and identifying which categories of transaction remain restricted. They might also assist with treaty analysis notes summarising which sanctions provisions require legislative action versus executive action to unwind, and prepare a choice-of-law summary for a shipping finance client assessing exposure under English-law governed loan documentation.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“A shipping client wants to resume cargo voyages through the Strait of Hormuz carrying Iranian oil. What legal questions would you need to answer before advising them it is safe to proceed, and which regulators or bodies would you need to consult?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeMy notes
saved