US charges Virginia tech CEO and Russian co-defendant with concealing Russian ownership of digital forensics firm Oxygen Forensics from US government agencies
The US Department of Justice has charged Lee Reiber, chief executive of Virginia-based Oxygen Forensics, and Oleg Davydov, a Russian national, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud after allegedly lying to US government agencies for years about who controlled the company. Reiber was arrested in Boise, Idaho on the Sunday before the charges were announced, and Davydov was arrested at London's Heathrow Airport as he prepared to board a flight to Istanbul. US authorities have indicated they will seek Davydov's extradition. Both men face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. Oxygen Forensics sells digital forensics software, used to extract and analyse data from phones and computers, to law enforcement and government agencies including the US Secret Service and Homeland Security Investigations. According to a criminal complaint, Davydov and four other Russian nationals secretly owned and controlled Oxygen Forensics through a holding company in Cyprus, with software written by a Russia-based team that Davydov directed. Reiber became CEO in March 2022, shortly before the Russian owners' names were removed from the company's public filings following the expansion of US sanctions on Russia after the Ukraine invasion. The concealment allegedly helped Oxygen Forensics secure a five-year, $12 million contract with a Secret Service training unit in 2024. Investigators seized Oxygen's corporate bank accounts and approximately 57 of its web domains under a warrant issued 19 September 2026. The US Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security is also investigating. The case follows public allegations by a former employee that Oxygen denied and responded to with a defamation lawsuit filed in August.
Why this matters
The case sits at the intersection of US national security, export control, and corporate fraud law, but carries direct UK relevance because of Davydov's arrest at Heathrow and the anticipated extradition process that will engage English courts and the UK-US extradition treaty framework. The alleged concealment of Russian ownership of a firm supplying sensitive forensics software to US security agencies illustrates a growing enforcement trend: governments are increasingly scrutinising the true beneficial ownership of technology companies holding government contracts, particularly where Russian connections are involved. The seizure of bank accounts and web domains before charges were announced signals the government's intent to disrupt the business operationally as well as pursue criminal liability.
On the Ground
For London-based lawyers, the most immediate work is on the Davydov extradition: extradition proceedings in England are heard in the Westminster Magistrates' Court and the High Court, and defence counsel will need to engage with the bars to extradition available under UK law, including assessing whether the conduct charged is a corresponding extraditable offence under English law. Separately, the case generates compliance and sanctions work for firms advising technology companies holding US government contracts on beneficial ownership disclosure obligations and the risk of sanctions-related liability. A trainee on an extradition matter would assist with chronology preparation, research on treaty provisions and case law on relevant bars to extradition, and court filing coordination.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“What legal process would a defendant arrested in the UK on a US federal charge face, and what arguments might their lawyers run to resist extradition?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeMy notes
saved