SFO secures combined 15-year-nine-month sentence against three directors of Ethical Forestry Limited for a £70 million pension investment fraud targeting more than 3,000 victims
On 3 September 2026, Southwark Crown Court sentenced three former directors of Ethical Forestry Limited to a combined 15 years and nine months in prison for orchestrating a seven-year, £70 million investment fraud. Matthew Pickard, 56, received six years; Stephen Greenaway, 47, five years and three months; and Paul Laver, 47, four years and six months. All three were also disqualified from acting as company directors for ten years. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) told the court that the three men ran a Bournemouth-based call centre that cold-called members of the public, many of them pensioners, and persuaded them to withdraw funds from their pension schemes and invest in a tree-planting operation in Costa Rica. Employees used false company names, concealing their true employer, to build victim trust before encouraging transfers. While trees were planted, nothing was set aside for maintenance or harvesting, making the promised returns impossible to achieve. Investigators found that the defendants spent millions of stolen money on luxury goods: Greenaway purchased a £1.9 million home; Pickard bought a £4.3 million property in Sandbanks, Poole. A further £2.77 million of investor money was diverted to fund a tax avoidance scheme for the directors' own benefit. The strength of the SFO's evidence prompted all three defendants to plead guilty to fraudulent trading in January 2026, ahead of a scheduled trial.
Why this matters
This conviction is a significant enforcement outcome for the SFO at a time when the agency's credibility has been under scrutiny, most recently in the ENRC civil litigation. The case illustrates the persistent danger of 'green' investment fraud, where legitimate environmental themes, here tree-planting, are used as cover to exploit investor trust, and it is likely to prompt fresh regulatory attention on unregulated alternative investment schemes marketed directly to pension holders. The ten-year director disqualification orders operate alongside the custodial sentences and extend the protective reach of the outcome beyond the prison terms.
On the Ground
The case activates fraud enforcement, regulatory investigations, and asset recovery practice areas. The SFO's evidence-gathering from a complex, multi-year fraud requiring forensic accounting, company records, and victim testimony represents a significant investigative workload. Separately, civil asset recovery claims may follow the confiscation proceedings implied by the prosecution, requiring tracing of funds through company accounts and personal property. A trainee on an SFO-adjacent fraud matter would assist with disclosure review and categorisation of documentary evidence, compile witness statement bundles, and prepare chronologies of fund flows for use in court filings.
Interview prep
Question you might get
“What are the key legal mechanisms the SFO and courts use to recover assets from convicted fraudsters, and how effective are they in practice?”
Sign up free to see the full answer
A model answer you can lift into an interview — how to frame this story for a partner.
Sign up freeSources
My notes
saved