How artificial intelligence is regulated, litigated, and reshaping the practice of law itself.
Law firms are deploying AI tools across their operations. Contract review platforms use natural language processing to extract and compare clauses across thousands of documents in a fraction of the time it would take a human team. Legal research tools powered by large language models can summarise case law, identify relevant precedents, and draft first-pass memoranda. Due diligence is being partly automated, with AI flagging change-of-control provisions, unusual liability clauses, and missing documents in data rooms. The profession is moving from scepticism to strategic adoption, but the critical question remains: how do you supervise AI output effectively, and where does professional liability sit when the machine gets it wrong?
The EU AI Act — which entered into force in August 2024 with phased implementation through 2027 — is the world's first comprehensive AI regulation. It classifies AI systems by risk level: unacceptable risk (banned outright, e.g., social scoring), high risk (subject to conformity assessments, human oversight, and transparency obligations), and lower-risk systems (lighter requirements). The UK has taken a deliberately different path, adopting a pro-innovation, principles-based framework that empowers existing sectoral regulators (FCA, Ofcom, CMA, ICO) to apply AI-specific guidance within their domains rather than creating a single AI regulator. For firms operating in both the UK and EU, navigating these divergent approaches is a growing compliance challenge.
Sign up free to read the rest
Why it matters for your applications, plus interview questions with model answers.
Sign up free