Haulage buyers win tribunal approval to serve £436 million class action against Scania over alleged price-fixing cartel

A tribunal in London has given the green light to buyers of haulage services to serve a proposed £436 million (approximately $589 million) class action against truck manufacturer Scania, after finding there was an arguable case that claimants had overpaid because a price-fixing cartel was operating. The ruling, handed down on Friday 17 July 2026, clears the procedural hurdle of service, allowing the claim to move to a substantive hearing. The case is a follow-on damages claim, meaning it relies on a prior regulatory finding that Scania and other truck manufacturers operated a cartel (an illegal agreement among competitors to fix prices or coordinate commercial behaviour), with claimants arguing that the cartel inflated the price of trucks, which in turn raised the operating costs of haulage companies. Those haulage companies then passed on higher costs to their customers, the buyers of haulage services, who form the claimant class. The £436 million figure represents the aggregate claim by the class of haulage buyers. Tribunals handling competition follow-on claims in the UK must assess at the certification stage whether the class has a realistic prospect of establishing both the existence of the cartel's effect and the pass-on of overcharges through the supply chain, questions that often require substantial economic expert evidence. The approval to serve is a meaningful procedural milestone: it confirms the tribunal found the claim arguable rather than speculative. The Scania truck cartel has generated follow-on litigation across multiple European jurisdictions, and this UK proceeding is part of that broader wave of damages actions.

Sign up to read →