US-Iran Peace Deal 'Largely Negotiated' as Strait of Hormuz Reopening Framework Emerges, Creating Wave of Cross-Border Commercial Law Work
The United States and Iran appear to be closing in on a deal to end the approximately three-month-old war, with US President Donald Trump describing the negotiations as "largely negotiated" over the weekend. Regional officials indicate the framework would involve the gradual reopening of the Strait of Hormuz — the narrow waterway between Iran and the Arabian Peninsula through which roughly one-fifth of globally traded oil flows — and the ending of the US naval blockade of Iran. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking after a joint press conference with India's External Affairs Minister in New Delhi, characterised the US position as seeking either "a good agreement" or dealing with Iran "another way," signalling that American negotiators retain leverage but are actively seeking a diplomatic conclusion. Talks are continuing, with the precise terms — including Iran's nuclear programme, sanctions relief, and sequencing of the Hormuz reopening — still to be finalised. For international commercial lawyers, the significance extends well beyond energy markets. A formal peace agreement would require the unwinding of extensive sanctions regimes, the renegotiation of shipping and insurance contracts constructed around the conflict, and the re-engagement of international financial institutions with Iranian counterparties. English law-governed trade finance, commodity, and shipping contracts that embedded war-risk clauses or invoked sanctions carve-outs during the conflict will require systematic review as normalisation proceeds.
Sign up to read →